Home > Global Politic > US shifts stance on Israel-Hamas talks: causes and consequences


US shifts stance on Israel-Hamas talks: causes and consequences


Experts discuss the US policy shift after failed Israel-Hamas talks, Iran’s influence, and possible scenarios for further escalation.

During the latest round of negotiations between Israel and Hamas, there was a significant shift in US rhetoric. US representative Steve Witkoff announced an end to talks, soon followed by Donald Trump calling for stronger action against Hamas. Senator Lindsey Graham echoed these sentiments, advocating for drastic measures in the Gaza Strip.

Experts associate this change with the failure of diplomatic efforts and Hamas' refusal to release hostages. Israel’s “Gideon’s Chariots” operation, launched in May 2025, aims to completely eliminate the Hamas threat in Gaza, though humanitarian consequences are considerable.

Sources indicate that Israel accuses Hamas of misappropriating humanitarian aid, and Iran’s role as sponsor and supporter of Hamas fighters is seen as pivotal in derailing negotiations. Meanwhile, international discussions about recognizing Palestine continue, despite concerns over regional security.

Experts draw parallels with the Russia-Ukraine war, noting the US shift results from the aggressor’s unwillingness to compromise. Further escalation between Israel and Hamas is expected, as Israel seeks to conclude the operation ahead of national elections. This situation influences peace prospects and Israel’s relations with Arab nations.

The conversation also addressed Iran’s nuclear program, which poses a separate risk to regional stability. Experts underscore the need for the international community to find new approaches, as Iran shows little interest in compromise.

The discussion recalled how Ukraine helped evacuate not only its own citizens but also foreigners during Middle East crises. Ukraine emphasizes the importance of humanitarian law and protection of civilians in conflicts, underlining its contribution to global stability and safeguarding people in critical situations.