The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine held a pivotal vote to restore the independence of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAP). This followed a previous law that limited the independence of anti-corruption bodies, sparking public protests in Kyiv and other cities.
Both the public and Western partners reacted decisively, with strong statements from European officials and threats to limit financial aid prompting a swift review of the decision. The government faced criticism for its lack of a calculated strategy and for adopting laws in a situational manner, undermining its authority during wartime.
Anti-corruption institutions are considered one of the key achievements of recent years and are linked to Ukraine’s path to European integration. Supporting their independence is essential not only for Ukraine's international image but also for building internal resistance to corruption, trust, and development prospects.
The vote also revealed the absence of a stable political majority in parliament, highlighting the situational nature of coalitions and its effect on governance stability. The need for political responsibility, clear ideological guidelines, and genuine independence for the entire law enforcement system is discussed.
The article analyzes prospects for restoring trust in anti-corruption bodies, the role of Western support, and the importance of transparency and democratic standards for Ukraine’s future and European aspirations.
