Following a recent meeting in Washington, news emerged that the US is establishing a special commission led by Marco Rubio to coordinate security guarantees for Ukraine after the end of hostilities. However, details remain unclear: there are no official documents or concrete decisions yet, and the process is seen as non-transparent and lacking in specifics.
Experts discussing the development note that, despite announcements, skepticism persists regarding real security guarantees for Ukraine. Arguments include shifting US foreign policy with each administration and inconsistency in delivering on promises, especially in military aid. Experience shows that changes in leadership often mean new approaches, putting long-term guarantees in doubt.
Specialists also stress that the foundation of Ukraine's security should be its own military strength and the development of its defense industry, with foreign companies potentially aiding recovery and modernization efforts.
Official statements highlight that different countries can participate sectorally: some in defense, intelligence, or financing. However, experts point out that many multi-party agreements signed in the past have remained mostly symbolic and provided little actual security.
In summary, analysts note that while the presence of international missions in Ukraine seems possible after the war, direct involvement of foreign troops during active fighting is unlikely. The consensus is that the latest Washington meeting produced little concrete progress, and discussions of security guarantees for Ukraine remain general and unresolved.
