European politicians have proposed the creation of a 40-km wide buffer zone on Ukrainian territory. According to the initiative, it is Ukraine that would have to make concessions, not Russia on the currently occupied territories. The proposal has sparked mixed reactions among analysts and politicians. Potential advantages include a decrease in hostilities and the involvement of international peacekeepers. However, there are significant risks—Ukraine could lose control over part of its territory, and security guarantees remain vague.
Confusion has arisen due to contradictory statements from officials, including Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan. Misinterpretation of his words by Telegram channels led to the spread of inaccurate claims about Russian concessions, which were not substantiated. This points to a lack of transparent communication between parties involved in the negotiations.
Meanwhile, the Ukrainian Cabinet is tightening regulations concerning mass events in Kyiv, now requiring approval from the General Staff. This has triggered debate regarding democratic freedoms and the authorities' preparations for potential elections.
Internationally, discussions continue regarding security guarantees for Ukraine. There is skepticism about the effectiveness of such guarantees, given the experience of the Budapest Memorandum and other unfulfilled agreements in previous conflicts. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announced agreements on the supply of missiles and expects security guarantees to be finalized soon. Turkey is also actively engaged in the process, including aspects of security in the Black Sea region.
European countries remain divided on deploying troops to a possible buffer zone: some support the idea, while others are not ready to participate militarily, even in a post-conflict scenario. According to sources, the US does not plan to play a key role in security guarantees.
Ukraine's internal political climate remains tense. Parliament's activity is frequently criticized, while the Cabinet is introducing stricter wartime regulations. Experts warn against risks to democratic practices.
Amid ongoing political debates and international support, Ukrainian forces continue to defend the nation. The public is urged to maintain unity, require transparency in decisions, and safeguard national sovereignty.
