Home > Global Politic > Internal Security, Concentration of Power and Democracy in the US: Expert Analysis of the New Strategy


Internal Security, Concentration of Power and Democracy in the US: Expert Analysis of the New Strategy


Discussion of the new US strategy on internal security, Trump's role, historical parallels with democracy and authoritarianism.

Experts are analyzing the new strategy of the United States aimed at strengthening the focus on internal security issues. Recent developments, including the gathering in Virginia with military leadership and statements by Donald Trump, indicate a desire to reinforce control within the country. Some analysts note that Trump’s actions and rhetoric resemble motifs from Hollywood films, with presentations of the new strategy accompanied by speeches reminiscent of movie motivations.

The discussion also covers different approaches to foreign and domestic policy, comparing the concepts of Zbigniew Brzezinski and Henry Kissinger regarding the US’s role in the world. Experts highlight the risks of strengthening authoritarian trends, suggesting that the concentration of power may lead to restrictions on democratic institutions under the pretext of maintaining security. According to analysts, Trump is preparing the public for such changes through public speeches and the demonstration of military and law enforcement strength.

Attention is also given to historical processes: examples from Ancient Greece, the Roman Republic, and Venice demonstrate that no political system is immune to transformations. Experts emphasize that the ability of society to offer alternatives is crucial to preventing the complete degradation of democracy.

The discussion also covers “Project 2025,” which, although denied by Trump, contains ideas about centralizing power, strengthening control over security institutions, and the possible limitation of elections under the pretext of wartime danger. Experts note that such strategies have been used before throughout world history to consolidate power.

According to participants, the future of the US political system depends on the dynamics of its internal opposition, which currently appears weak. The next steps taken by the country’s leadership remain under close international scrutiny, given the importance of US policy to global stability.