Will Donald Trump remain close and willing to support Europe? Experts note that, despite some statements about possibly reducing the US presence on NATO's eastern flank, there are no concrete steps to withdraw troops or reduce air power. On the contrary, during Trump's presidency, additional strategic bombers capable of carrying nuclear weapons were deployed in the UK, indicating ongoing military support for allies.
According to the analysis, Trump's "peacekeeping" rhetoric and calls for Europe to pursue greater self-sufficiency in security do not mean an immediate US withdrawal from the region. The main idea is that Europe should take the lead in its own security, with the US supporting from the background. Allies, however, are expected to react strongly to any real move to reduce US forces in Europe.
NATO projects previously carried out with US backing are expected to remain relevant, especially as Russia continues its policy of confrontation. Russia’s aggressive actions further strengthen NATO unity. Kremlin’s demands for NATO to revert to pre-1997 positions are rejected; had there been no Russian escalation, the US might have considered reducing expenditures. In the current situation, however, any withdrawal would be perceived as weakness by Washington.
Regarding strategic armaments, Trump maintains a firm stance and is unlikely to agree to Russian demands to limit US missile defense initiatives. Experts stress that public statements may diverge from actual policy moves, necessitating ongoing analysis. In summary, US policy toward Europe will depend on Russia’s next steps and Europe’s internal debates.
Experts highlight the importance of discussing these topics and emphasize the significance of political literacy for Ukrainians.
