An expert discusses Donald Trump's recent statement about the potential transfer of 'Tomahawk' missiles to Ukraine. According to the commentator, Trump's words should not be interpreted literally. The former US president acts more as a businessman than a politician, leaving himself room for maneuver in negotiations and public statements.
The expert highlights that such statements are primarily political gestures intended to pressure Russia, not concrete action plans. The supply of long-range missiles like Tomahawk is restricted by international agreements and technical limitations: Tomahawk missiles are launched from sea platforms or submarines not available to Ukraine.
The analysis notes the considerable financial constraints for both the US and Ukraine, referencing the high costs of defensive systems such as Patriots. Consequently, Trump's comments serve more as a political signal to Moscow and Europe rather than an actionable policy.
The expert further explains the main positions of the US, Europe, and Russia, observing that Trump typically uses rhetoric about "peace through strength" but is cautious about escalation against Russia. Examples of similar approaches in other regions are cited, stressing Trump's tendency to adjust his statements depending on evolving situations.
The conclusion is that such initiatives are subject to international political realities and legal limitations, making the actual transfer of long-range missiles to Ukraine unlikely for now. Trump's statements reflect his characteristic political communication style.
