This article provides a detailed analysis of the outcomes of the interrupted meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and former US President Donald Trump. The author highlights that Trump proposes halting the war along the current front line, while Zelensky agrees only if this leads to further negotiations on peace terms.
The article also notes Russia's activity in the information space and attempts to influence perceptions. There is emphasis on the challenges faced by Ukraine, including the lack of promised weaponry from the US, and the increasing reliance on diplomacy as a tool for conflict resolution.
European countries, especially the UK and the Netherlands, are calling for the swift development of a joint strategy to support Ukraine and are building coalitions to determine a common position. The influence of China is also discussed, as it now plays a more assertive role on the international stage.
The piece compares two approaches to "freezing" the conflict: Trump's model is to stop hostilities immediately and leave the judgment of victory to history, while Zelensky's model sees the ceasefire as the start of detailed peace negotiations.
The article analyzes the dynamic of international diplomatic contacts and the expectations for crucial decisions at forthcoming European meetings. It also underscores the importance of supporting Ukrainian forces and calls for charitable contributions. Alongside the main topics, information warfare and attempts at interference are considered. The article concludes with a realistic outlook on the prospects of ending the war by Christmas and encourages support for the military and the informational space.
