Dmitriev, representing the Kremlin, has unveiled new terms for a 'rapid end to the war', visiting the US and attempting to justify Putin's position in the West. Notably, Russia voiced readiness to discuss security guarantees for Ukraine—an unprecedented step. Simultaneously, the Russian side now agrees to consider a 'frozen conflict' line, a stance it had previously rejected.
However, the US and European countries have responded to these Kremlin initiatives with a new package of sanctions targeting Russian banks, energy companies, and frozen assets, increasing pressure on the Russian economy. This has prompted even domestic criticism on Russian television, where the effectiveness of sanctions has been recognized.
The author also analyzes the role of US Senator Rubio, who adopted a tougher stance against Russia and thwarted a possible Trump-Putin summit in Budapest, leaving Orban's Hungary without anticipated political gains and subject to expanded sanctions.
Orban, having increased Hungary's energy dependence on Russia, faces mounting pressure and a declining approval rating amidst a rising opposition. Meanwhile, Turkey and President Erdogan propose hosting a new round of talks in Istanbul, though such initiatives are approached with caution.
The article stresses that safeguarding Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity remains a priority: proposals for 'frozen' lines and territorial compromises are rejected by the Ukrainian side. President Zelensky called deliveries of Gripen jets a reinforcement of Ukraine's guarantees, but admits that 150 jets do not fully resolve future security challenges.
Religious leaders offer optimistic forecasts of the war's end, yet the author urges readers to remain realistic. The deciding factors remain sanctions pressure, diplomatic engagement, and strengthening Ukraine's defense. The author concludes: peace terms are determined by international solidarity with Ukraine and its right to self-defense.
