Kiril Dmitriev’s visit to Washington drew considerable attention and indicated some shifts in Russia’s approach. Moscow appears open to discussing certain plans, but many experts view this as an attempt to delay the process and send signals to the West about readiness for talks. However, according to commentators, the US currently has little interest in dialogue with Russian envoys, as reflected by the lack of high-level meetings and strong statements from American officials.
Dmitriev’s meetings with Western officials were not confirmed; instead, he spoke mostly to Western media. The US response remained reserved: both Dmitriev and the Russian delegation are seen more as propagandists than genuine negotiators. Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov stated that Moscow expects proposals from the US, highlighting a lack of strong arguments from the Kremlin after setbacks on the front and increased sanctions pressure.
President Zelensky has previously noted that the US has already conveyed proposals to the Kremlin, including the Keith Kellogg plan, which was rejected by Russia. This situation points to internal divisions within the Russian leadership, who have yet to agree on negotiations or continued military action.
Complicating matters is the escalation of Russian strikes on Ukraine’s critical infrastructure, specifically in the energy sector. Ukrainian experts and leaders, including President Zelensky and Chief of Intelligence Budanov, warn that Russia plans to destabilize Ukraine this winter and provoke a humanitarian crisis. Despite the increasing attacks, Ukraine is experienced in managing such challenges, and both authorities and society are preparing for a tough winter.
At the same time, Western and American aid remain critical for stabilization. Financial shortages, the scope of assistance, and European commitment to sanctions could significantly impact the situation. Experts note the Russian economy is under severe strain, and determined Western pressure may accelerate political changes in the Kremlin.
The situation remains dynamic: ongoing signals from Washington and Moscow, sanctions, military events, and risks to Ukrainian infrastructure will shape the coming months.
