New details have emerged from the ongoing Swiss peace talks. These include attention to Ukrainian negotiator Rustem Umerov’s broken pen and possible meetings involving Donald Trump. Analysts note that the deadline for these negotiations may be shifted.
Journalists emphasize the debate surrounding the so-called 28 points, which, according to some politicians and experts, are heavily influenced by Russia. The US highlights three key aspects: should Russia launch a new offensive, the US president would be authorized to deploy American troops and intelligence, NATO allies would act in sync, and the guarantees would last 10 years.
Some issues—such as army reduction, language, and church matters—officially remain outside the scope but reportedly appear in a secret section of negotiations. There are concerns in Ukrainian and Western media that only limited information will be presented to the parliament and that multiple violations of international law are at stake.
European experts and politicians fear being sidelined from the core talks between Ukraine, the US, and Russia, potentially weakening Europe’s influence. Observers note that the West may be seeking to settle the issue according to its interests.
In Ukraine, there is increasing concern over pressure and corruption cases involving negotiators. The public is urged not to agree to guarantees limited to 10 years, seen by many as merely providing Russia time for renewed aggression.
Media coverage remains divided: while some outlets stress calm and positive aspects, others highlight the risks and violations involved. The author calls for honest discussion on the state of the peace process and for an emphasis on Ukraine’s independence and security.
