Home > Peace Talks > Trump's Updated Plan: Geneva, International Reaction and Next Negotiation Steps


Trump's Updated Plan: Geneva, International Reaction and Next Negotiation Steps


Political analyst Ihor Chelenko analyzes global responses to the updated Trump peace plan and Geneva negotiations.

On November 24, political scientist Ihor Chelenko commented on the updated 28-point Trump plan, which underwent significant changes after negotiations in Geneva. The initial draft involved concessions in eastern Ukraine, restrictions on the Ukrainian army and abandoning NATO, issues that concerned Ukraine and its European allies. The revised version now partly aligns with Ukraine's demands for sovereignty and security.

On November 23, representatives from the US, Ukraine and several European countries worked on amending the plan. Negotiators called the talks constructive, with the new document covering sovereignty, security guarantees, and economic recovery. However, Donald Trump said during the talks that Ukraine allegedly showed “zero gratitude,” stressing the text was not final. Afterwards, Trump tweeted about significant progress, and reports emerged of a possible meeting between Trump and Zelenskyy in Washington in the coming weeks.

In parallel, European countries prepared an alternative draft with tougher security mechanisms and sanctions for Russia, omitting points about Ukraine abandoning NATO. US reactions remain split: some politicians see the update as a step toward resolution, while others argue the original plan was too favorable to Moscow. The discussion remains polarized.

The UK response focuses on ensuring Europe's security and notes that concessions to Russia could create new risks for the continent. The EU supports an approach that does not limit Ukraine's defense. China remains neutral, emphasizing the fact of talks without commenting on substance. Russia has reacted cautiously, waiting for the final text, but Russian media present the plan as potentially beneficial for the Kremlin.

Ukraine insists that sovereignty cannot be the subject of negotiation and refuses outside limits on its alliances. Ukrainian media view the Geneva talks as progress toward coordination, but do not expect quick decisions. Within society, there is debate over the boundaries of compromise and potential long-term risks.

The next stage of negotiations is expected in Washington, where Ukraine is demanding real security guarantees that are not subject to US or EU political cycles. Mechanisms for implementation and oversight remain the key topics. An upcoming Pentagon delegation visit to Moscow may also be significant. Ukraine seeks clear security arrangements to guarantee protection if agreements are violated.