In this videoblog, the author comments on the topical article by Commander-in-Chief Zaluzhnyi, which has sparked widespread debate. The core points, as highlighted by the author, seem obvious: the war in Ukraine is at a stalemate, as Zaluzhnyi himself has acknowledged repeatedly.
Another key point is the lack of clearly defined war goals, an issue that has long worried independent analysts. According to the author, Zaluzhnyi emphasizes the pointlessness of the war and the absence of a coherent political vision for its conclusion. Drawing parallels with Finland's experience, the author argues that maintaining statehood sometimes means making difficult compromises to avoid greater destruction and loss.
The article also raises the issue of the constitution being cited hypocritically: rarely applied inside the country, but used as a key argument in international discourse. The author notes the role of the US in seeking to resolve the deadlock and sets out the dilemma: accept a less favorable peace, or risk even greater losses if the war continues.
Citing the example of the Dayton Accords in Bosnia, the article points to the need for a realistic assessment of goals and the motivation of society. Every choice has its costs, and even Zaluzhnyi offers no positive scenario at this stage. The videoblog closes with a call to support independent analysis and critical thinking about Ukraine’s future.
