The program discussed two key scenarios for negotiations on the war in Ukraine. First, the United States' firm position that Ukrainian forces must withdraw from certain territories. Russia, meanwhile, demands a full withdrawal, threatening military or diplomatic action to achieve this. Ukraine proposes freezing the conflict along the current frontline, while the US is seeking a compromise in the form of a demilitarized zone.
However, Ukraine's leadership, including President Zelensky, consider territorial issues unresolved. The Ukrainian Armed Forces have influenced the negotiation dynamic, and the frontline remains contested but is not in a critical state. Russia continues negotiations out of economic and human resource necessity, as its capabilities are gradually diminishing.
The idea of a demilitarized or free economic zone under international (e.g., UN) administration is discussed, though questions remain about its governance and tax arrangements. A compromise between Russia and Ukraine might prevent further escalation, but the final format is still unclear.
Parallels with the Minsk agreements show the current situation is viewed not as Ukraine’s capitulation but as a bid to freeze the conflict and maintain sovereignty. Experts urge against using the term “capitulation”, highlighting that Ukraine remains a sovereign nation and could eventually regain its territories diplomatically.
It is noted that the US may present an “ultimatum” linking security guarantees to progress in negotiations. Russia’s resources are running low, making compromise increasingly necessary for both sides. Ukraine's primary goal is to reach peace, preserve statehood, and eventually restore its territories.
