Recently, discussions have intensified about potential joint projects between the US and Russia, which Donald Trump believes could improve the trade balance and support the US budget. However, these initiatives provoke mixed reactions in both US political circles and within Russia.
One of the proposed ideas is a large-scale tunnel project between Kamchatka and Alaska. Experts consider it unrealistic, yet it illustrates the ambition to engage Trump with grand initiatives. The stronger the resistance from Congress, however, the less likely such projects are to be implemented due to strict legislative oversight—especially with opposition from both Democrats and some Republicans.
The central question is whether these projects benefit the US or Russia more. There’s a view that Trump aims to support Russia to limit its dependence on China. For Russia, maintaining independence as a global player is crucial, while the US faces criticism for cooperating with a sanctioned state.
Key congressional figures, like Marco Rubio, significantly influence negotiation outcomes. Cases where Congress blocked Trump’s meetings with Russian leaders show growing legislative control over international agreements.
The geopolitical environment is further complicated by China’s involvement. Both the US and Russia are navigating strategies regarding Moscow's dependence on Beijing. Among the possible trajectories is the signing of a historic agreement that could grant Ukraine special partnership status with the US outside of NATO, subject to Congressional review.
Overall, the prospects for US-Russia joint projects remain contentious amid US domestic political struggles, economic challenges for Russia, and external actors’ influence. Experts emphasize the importance of a flexible approach and active dialogue to retain strategic momentum.
