On January 7, the Center for Public Energy "Vezha" hosted a conversation with Vladyslav Faraponov, Head of the Institute of American Studies, discussing the consequences of Maduro's arrest for US domestic policy and its impact on relations with Ukraine.
The arrest of Nicolás Maduro by US forces has been framed by the White House not as a military operation, but as the detention of a criminal. This event has sparked debate among both Republicans and Democrats in Congress. Some Republican representatives, including critics of US support for Ukraine, expressed concerns about the lack of Congressional consultation. Meanwhile, Democrats are demanding greater transparency and accountability from the Trump administration.
There are concerns that such operations could result in prolonged US military presence abroad. Political polarization in Washington persists—both major parties seek to avoid further military entanglements, while security and foreign policy remain central campaign themes ahead of the elections.
Implications for Trump and the Republican Party were discussed. The operation against Maduro is unlikely to drastically affect Trump's core support base, though it may provide new grounds for criticism from Democrats and be used in electoral strategies by both parties.
Trump’s recent statements on increasing US influence over Greenland were analyzed. Among the American public, these comments have met a muted reaction, primarily due to a lack of clear rationale. European partners emphasized the importance of adhering to international law, with a forceful scenario deemed highly unlikely.
Experts note that, ahead of US elections, the political situation remains dynamic. The effectiveness of US foreign policy will depend on how well the administration communicates with both the public and Congress.
Ultimately, US support for Ukraine remains positive, despite some ambivalence in Trump’s approach, in light of current geopolitical circumstances.
