The recent meeting between the leaders of the US and China brought no extraordinary breakthroughs—both sides simply agreed to keep negotiating. The moratoriums on unfriendly economic actions were formally extended, but many expected more substantial progress. Experts described the encounter as a strategic dialogue between two global giants, with economic relations, tariffs, and the supply of rare earths dominating the agenda while issues like Ukraine were likely not a top priority.
It was also emphasized that under Xi Jinping, China’s main ambition is economic leadership rather than militarization, though strengthening military power remains a standard feature of global geopolitics. China also exports military equipment to Global South countries, using such exports as a tool of influence.
After the meeting, both sides made statements about cooperating for the greater global good. However, interpretations of what constitutes this “good” differ. Notably, Xi is often seen in public alongside Russia’s and North Korea's leaders, prompting concerns about Beijing’s support for Russia’s war in Ukraine. Experts point out that such support could be direct or indirect—via arms exports or economic cooperation.
The discussion within Ukraine continues on how to relate to countries that either openly or indirectly support aggression. Some advocate a black-and-white approach—support or no support—while others recognize the complexity and ambiguity of international relations, where “fog of war” and varied interests blur clear assessments.
Analysts encourage continued open dialogue regarding the positions of world leaders and the influence of international actors on the situation in Ukraine, to shape common understanding and guide diplomatic cooperation moving forward.
