Recently, there has been an ongoing debate about the actual level of support that Europe and the US offer Ukraine in confronting Russian aggression. Observers note that, despite public declarations of support, European leaders remain cautious and seem reluctant to provide swift and large-scale assistance.
It is emphasized that new initiatives for a ceasefire or peace talks are often viewed as favoring Russia and as a way to buy time, waiting for political changes in the US or Europe. As long as Russian forces achieve even minor advances, Moscow sees no reason to compromise or start real negotiations.
Critics highlight the lack of strict sanctions—such as the delayed ban on Russian LNG purchases until 2027—which provides Russia with opportunities to continue the war. The main argument stays the same: genuine strategic support will happen only if most EU countries recognize Russia as a total threat and move from rhetoric to concrete steps and increased funding for Ukraine’s security.
Currently, Ukraine receives some support but it is not enough to halt Russian advances. Resolving the reparational loan issue, accelerating decision-making in Brussels, and increasing military and financial aid could improve the situation. For now, time works in Russia’s favor—a fact not fully acknowledged by all European players.
Therefore, prospects for peace talks remain distant so long as active fighting continues and there is no political will to radically restrict Russian resources.
