The resignation of Andriy Yermak as Head of the President’s Office of Ukraine has become a major political event this week. It was widely discussed that Yermak accumulated significant power and influence but also made many adversaries both in Ukraine and abroad. Although the official cause for the resignation was a personal request and the president’s decision, experts argue that this was inevitable due to growing anti-corruption investigations led by the NABU.
In his special address, President Volodymyr Zelensky emphasized Yermak’s managerial skills, stating that he consistently defended Ukraine’s interests and performed his duties with dignity. Notably, the speech did not include any negative remarks about Yermak or allegations of corruption. At the same time, society is actively discussing Yermak’s potential future role, especially considering the power structure he built around the presidential team.
Anti-corruption bodies, including NABU and SAP, have yet to file official suspicions, but further investigative actions are not ruled out. Observers believe that the resignation will not fundamentally affect Ukraine's foreign negotiations, including with the USA, since key negotiation positions are set by the state’s agreed strategy, not by specific delegation personalities.
Yermak’s resignation has also altered the internal political landscape. Despite his formal departure, experts predict that he will remain an influential figure, possibly as an advisor or shadow manager to the president. In the West, the event is interpreted in the context of a corruption scandal, although there is currently no direct evidence of Yermak’s involvement. Political circles also discuss who might replace him and whether this will impact the president’s office efficiency.
Overall, the Yermak resignation highlights the complexities of Ukraine's political processes and the challenges associated with reform, anti-corruption activity, and securing external support.
