For two days, Ukraine has intensely discussed the tragic killing of a military recruitment officer and war veteran in Lviv. The speaker emphasizes this scenario as typical of a society that mainly battles consequences, overlooking the root causes behind such incidents.
Instead of analyzing the underlying factors, public attention is on addressing burial sites, land allocation, and procedural organization—reactions to symptoms, not their source. The author stresses that the core issues are neglected, though they warrant the most social dialogue and scrutiny.
The author compares this trend to the evolution of the war: in 2022, hope for a rapid repulse and victory mobilized society, but by 2025, the war had become stagnant and positional, with distant goals and heroism no longer a mass phenomenon. People’s instinct to preserve life has grown stronger.
One key reason for declining motivation is widespread disappointment with corruption, lack of transparency, and the absence of clear military objectives. There is a sense that personal sacrifice has lost meaning, especially amid scandals and reports of looting within military and civic structures.
The authorities are said to focus on the aftermath, offering repressive measures instead of pragmatic dialogue about the war. Without deeper analysis, the trends will worsen. Transparency about the real state of war, expectations, and accountability is called for.
The conclusion is that honestly addressing root causes—not just consequences—is the only way to reduce tragedies and social division. By addressing core issues, society can prevent further tragic events that undermine the nation.
