Home > Politic > Debate on Elections in Ukraine: Political Context, International Influence and Constitutional Issues


Debate on Elections in Ukraine: Political Context, International Influence and Constitutional Issues


A discussion on the prospects for elections in Ukraine during wartime, the role of Russia and the West, and constitutional considerations.

The prospect of holding elections in Ukraine during martial law has become a subject of much public debate. President Zelensky stated that elections would be possible only if security guarantees are provided by European and American partners. However, parliamentary representatives emphasize that there are currently no legislative changes, and security remains the main condition.

Organizing elections is further complicated by the estimated 7 million Ukrainian citizens currently abroad. Many consular facilities cannot enable all willing citizens to vote within one day, potentially leading to dissatisfaction and contesting of results.

The significant cost is also a factor: the most recent presidential campaign cost 2.4 billion UAH. During active warfare, such expenditures are being questioned for their practicality.

Russia has not officially demanded presidential elections in Ukraine. Instead, Russian officials point out the legitimacy of Parliament and call for the transfer of power through the creation of a new coalition and potential resignation of the current president. Experts view this rhetoric as an attempt to destabilize the Ukrainian political situation and to repeat scenarios from 2014.

The key constitutional issue lies in the limited powers of an acting president should the current head of state be removed or resign. This weakens the institution of the presidency during martial law and complicates the effective management of the security and defense sectors.

Experts conclude that ceasefire and reform of electoral legislation are essential for any elections. Russia's claims of illegitimacy are seen as political pressure, and the ongoing war presents serious challenges to holding democratic processes.