On November 7, the Center for Public Ethics "Vezha" hosted a discussion with Yevhen Magda, director of the Institute of World Policy and professor. The main focus was the influence of global players on the prospects for ending the Russian-Ukrainian war.
Magda noted that announcements about Hungary possibly abandoning Russian oil prior to Orban’s Washington trip have political motives. While the MOL company claims readiness for alternatives, the government’s stance remains unclear. Orban may seek to capitalize on his relationship with Trump and offer himself as an intermediary between the US and Russia, but there are no real grounds for a swift resolution.
Donald Trump continues Washington's policy of engaging with Central Asian countries influenced by Russia and China. Meanwhile, both China and Europe remain cautious on providing guarantees or intervening to end the war. According to Magda, global politics are increasingly multipolar, making rapid solutions unrealistic.
It is critical for Ukraine to assess the situation realistically, abandon hopes of a quick peace, and enhance its own agency. Magda emphasizes that while the impact of international partners is significant, Ukraine needs creative and responsible decisions from its leadership and society.
The discussion also highlighted that China benefits from "stable instability" in Europe, while the US may reduce its influence. Ukrainian authorities must act proactively, utilizing international support and developing comprehensive strategies to address the crisis. Magda stresses the importance of defending national interests and proactively seeking further international backing.
The participants concluded that Ukraine’s future largely depends on its own agency, with a prolonged war possible due to its lack. Experts and the public underscore the need for a strategic approach and greater domestic resilience.
