Recently, there has been active discussion on why the European Union often delays providing assistance to Ukraine, with key triggers frequently arising from US statements. The main reason lies in the EU’s collegial decision-making system, in contrast to the presidential system in the US. Sanctions packages and aid measures require internal political agreement and consideration of national interests among member states.
A significant factor is the political future of European leaders, who must consider their approval ratings, governmental coalitions, and the positions of populist forces. This slows the adoption of defense or sanction measures in Ukraine’s favor. Leaders such as Germany’s chancellor act mainly based on internal political dynamics.
Meanwhile, sustained global attention and action on the war are gradually waning, as societies adapt to the ongoing conflict. Support primarily comes as expendables, funds, weapons, and some political influence, but there is no direct NATO troop participation. Politicians in countries like Germany and Poland put national interests and electoral prospects first.
Internationally, the US plays a key role, and statements from leaders like Donald Trump often expedite EU decisions on sanctions or military support. Yet, the American approach is marked by isolationist tendencies, affecting European partners’ motivations.
Additionally, political crises in neighboring countries and rising prices are strengthening populist parties, complicating continued support for Ukraine. Ukrainian experts emphasize the need for a comprehensive informational campaign to highlight the benefits of cooperating with Ukraine, its role in defending Europe, and its investment potential.
