The global community is debating whether schoolchildren should be allowed to use smartphones. While most teenagers bring devices to school, many countries have begun imposing bans. South Korea, China, Finland, the US, the Netherlands, Germany, and the UK each apply different levels of restriction.
Recent research shows that banning smartphones can improve students’ academic performance and discipline. In India, weaker students’ grades improved after restrictions. In Scotland, exam results rose and bullying decreased. In the Netherlands, the learning environment became calmer following bans, despite initial protests.
In Germany, only 2% of schools allow unrestricted phone use. Most institutions have rules limiting smartphone usage during lessons or on premises. Teachers report a better atmosphere and greater student focus.
In the UK, parents and school heads encourage delaying smartphone ownership for children until age 14. The widespread “Child Without Smartphone” campaign has led to a significant drop in the number of students with devices.
Studies indicate that the effectiveness of such bans depends on a systemic approach; monitoring device use both at school and at home is essential. Critics argue that children should be taught responsible use, not just outright bans.
In Ukraine, no national law prohibits mobile phones in schools, but individual schools may set their own rules. Experience from many countries shows that school smartphone restrictions can positively affect learning outcomes and student behavior.
