On the "Klochk Time" channel, political scientist Ihor Reiterovych analyzes Donald Trump’s recent high-profile statement. The former US President posted an open “letter” on his social media to NATO countries and the world, expressing readiness to impose significant sanctions on Russia—if all NATO members agree on similar measures and stop buying Russian oil.
Trump also proposed tariffs of 50–100% by NATO on China, to be lifted only after the end of Russia’s war against Ukraine. He argued this would weaken the link between China and Russia, limiting Beijing’s support for Moscow and hastening the end of the conflict.
Reiterovych points out that Trump refers to the war in Ukraine as “Biden’s and Zelensky’s war,” without mentioning Putin’s responsibility. The political scientist criticizes this stance, noting that the actual facts show a sharp reduction in EU purchases of Russian oil. Today, Hungary, Slovakia, and Turkey are primary buyers, while Europe plans to end Russian gas imports by 2027.
Reiterovych emphasizes that Trump’s talk of sanctions and tariffs merely shifts responsibility to the EU and NATO, while the real obstacles are leaders close to Trump himself, such as those of Hungary and Slovakia. Despite calls to pressure China and India, the analyst notes that sanctions imposed by the EU on India are already more effective than those by the US, and the pressure on China should also come from Washington.
In summary, Reiterovych sees Trump’s statements as an attempt to buy time and lacking a clear action plan. This could be a signal not just to Russia, but also to US allies, and the final decision on further sanctions will depend on Trump if he returns to office. Any hesitation risks negative consequences for the West and for the US itself.
