Last week, Donald Trump met with Vladimir Putin, dubbing the event a breakthrough, yet in reality, the US did not reap any diplomatic rewards. The American delegation’s display, such as laying out a red carpet for the Russian dictator, drew criticism and symbolized a diplomatic setback for the US. While the Western delegation examined the potential consequences of the talks, Russia intensified its strikes against Ukraine, including major attacks in Kharkiv that killed civilians.
Trump promised security guarantees for Ukraine and announced the potential deployment of European troops. However, no concrete agreements were reached, and the Kremlin swiftly rejected peacekeeping initiatives. Concurrently, Russia carried out large-scale missile strikes on key infrastructure, such as the Flex factory in Mukachevo.
Trump’s former advisors highlight differences in negotiation styles between him and Putin. Trump relies heavily on improvisation and personal relationships, while Moscow pursues methodical, long-term pressure. The US has not expanded weapons deliveries to Ukraine; instead, it favors arms sales via Europe and has increased the price on air defense systems.
The Kremlin’s relentless missile attacks coincide with Trump’s loud claims about ending the war, which remain rhetorical for now. Major risks include potential efforts to make deals at Ukraine’s expense and a lack of consistent US support. With negotiations deadlocked, US attitudes on further support for Ukraine remain uncertain.
