Recent statements by Donald Trump regarding the possibility of supplying Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine have caused widespread discussion. In the Oval Office, Trump noted that no final decision had been made yet and emphasized the need to consider how Ukraine would use these missiles. As a result, the potential transfer of Tomahawks remains uncertain, especially as there is an international treaty on the non-proliferation of intermediate-range missiles, which includes Tomahawks.
Meanwhile, Ukraine has received permission to purchase Patriot systems and their missiles from the United States without restrictions. The main issue remains funding, which European partners are expected to provide. This situation parallels ongoing debates over the EU budget for defense projects.
Journalists attempted to clarify whether Ukraine had actually received approval for Tomahawk supply, but Ukrainian officials currently lack a definitive position on the matter. The Trump administration is notably cautious about future control over such missiles.
Russia, and specifically President Vladimir Putin, responded strongly—Putin stated that the supply of long-range missiles such as Tomahawk would worsen relations between Washington and Moscow.
At the same time, Ukraine signed a memorandum with Denmark on joint production of military equipment, technology exchange, and attracting EU funding. While there are risks of technology leakage, these projects are seen as vital for Ukraine's defense capacity.
The issue of Russian drone provocations in European airspace and the EU response is also being discussed. Analysts suggest the Kremlin's main goal is to intimidate European countries, but the actual effect has been the opposite: European support for Ukraine is increasing.
In summary, the situation with Western military aid and Kremlin rhetoric remains tense. Ukraine continues to strengthen international defense coalitions, while the Kremlin seeks to instill fear in Europe.
