US President Donald Trump has definitively rejected Iran’s new proposals to end the US-Iran war. The decision stems from Iran’s unwillingness to abandon its nuclear program—their proposal focused only on reopening maritime passage through the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for the US dropping its blockade, before eventual talks on ending hostilities and nuclear issues.
The US administration contends that such terms don’t ensure a halt to Iran’s nuclear and missile ambitions, which have shown direct impact amid recent conflicts in the Middle East. Accepting Iran’s offer could be interpreted as a concession to Tehran, without meeting the main US strategic demands.
Trump now faces a choice between resuming direct military action or maintaining economic pressure through continued blockade. According to US Treasury Secretary Scott Besant, the blockade’s effectiveness is straining Iran’s economy and could force Iranian authorities to reconsider their nuclear stance.
Iran, meanwhile, hopes to weather the situation for several more months, betting on an escalating global energy crisis and political division in Washington, especially ahead of congressional elections. A clash between Republicans and Democrats is likely if the blockade and maritime access issues persist.
Other global players are involved: Russia profits from rising oil prices and advises Iran to hold on, while China struggles with supply shortages, seeking a balance between its interests and US political developments. These divergent interests influence Iran’s strategy.
Experts observe a prolonged war of attrition between the US and Iran, the results of which could significantly impact both governments and broader Middle East stability.
