The mass shooting in Kyiv's Holosiivskyi district has triggered widespread public debate. The commentary focuses on a fundamental issue in Ukrainian society: the "everyone for themselves" principle, which, according to the author, has become the basis of an unspoken social contract. Citizens often find themselves unprotected by the state, and law enforcement may be a source of danger or act purely out of self-interest.
War, ongoing crises, and government abuses have deepened this trend. Society has become increasingly caste-based: the upper strata protect their interests and maintain exclusive control over resources, while the lower classes are left to survive according to the principle "everyone for themselves, if lucky".
The issue of gun ownership and the right to self-defense is also raised. Experiences from countries like the USA and Canada demonstrate both the potential benefits and risks of legalizing firearms. In Ukraine, legalization could affect not only security levels but also the relationship between citizen and state, especially given the low trust in law enforcement.
A significant part of the commentary highlights the psychological impact of war and the general devaluation of human life during prolonged crises. The author stresses that the state's failure to protect its citizens leads to the spread of the "everyone for themselves" mindset and fosters greater social isolation and unpredictable behavior.
In conclusion, the commentary calls for a critical reassessment of the social contract and the state's role in protecting ordinary people, as well as a discussion of possible consequences of legalizing firearms in Ukraine's current context.
